November 27, 2008
A Response to: ‘You’re Scaring Me, Obama: Let the Bush Years Die by Heather Wokusch‘
Dateline: Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 27, 2008.
Dear Ms. Heather,
I wish the same as you do in your letter to Mr. Obama. The reality however is manifestly otherwise, and was/is very predictable. As Robert Jensen noted in his recent article “Real hope: Facing difficult truths about an uncertain future”, just below yours on AFP,
“Expressions of hope are only as truly hopeful as the honesty of the assessment of reality from which they emerge. Conjuring up hope rooted in a denial of reality can only deepen despair in the long run.”
And therefore, the response to this statement in your letter is probably already obvious to everyone else reading it:
‘In short, Mr. President-elect, you promised “Change we can believe in,” but across the board it’s looking a lot more like “Business as usual.” ‘
But just for the sake of completeness, Mr. Obama’s favorite philosopher is probably Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski. Mr. Obama’s favorite financiers are probably from the same Rockefeller money. Mr. Obama’s election campaign, probably the costliest in American election history, some say to the tune of $2 billion dollars, merely to ensure that a ‘change’ mantra would get sewn into the fabric of American social discourse – which has apparently succeeded, as all of the right, left, and center, echo that mantra. The reality of ‘change’ is analyzed here:
which noted on October 22, 2008:
“I predict that new faces will adorn the White House because the police-state is not ready to overtly break surface just yet, and people still need to be given the illusion of choice less they revolt before they have been fully enslaved and microchipped. Since you people seem fed up with the taste of vanilla for 8 years, we shall now give you chocolate! And wouldn’t that be a revolutionary step for America?”
And the proof of the pudding is in its eating – as reflected in the leader quote above.
Webster Tarpley had noted in April 2008, in his book, “Obama, the Postmodern Coup – Making of a Manchurian Candidate”, that Mr. Obama would prove to be more dangerous for America, and the world, than even his predecessor, because the endgame, the engagement of Russia, and the carryover of decimating Pakistan and Iran, would happen on his watch.
Tarpley felt that Iran might be pitted against Russia as Brzezinski’s favorite modus operandi against his favorite enemy. I have felt that these three might actually get united as a matter of survival tactic having learnt from the recent past of how USSR was dismembered. But regardless of who allies with whom, the Asian land mass is the prize, which unless won, cannot construct a world government. Asia owns most of the known natural resources of the world. Asia is also the target of most of the population reduction schemes of the de facto emperor of Western world, Mr. David Rockefeller. Hear and watch him express his concerns in his own voice here:
and the analysis of the agendas, including population reduction and Henry Kissinger’s very un-secret long running alternative program of NSSM 200 here:
And see many study references here:
And Mr. Obama is merely the new link in the chain of its acquisition. Why so many people might have been so confused, and continually get confused, is beyond me. The principles of conquest are in plain sight, and available for all to see. Anyone who might stand against them, would not even get past the election Primaries, never mind be chosen as the lead candidate of an establishment’s political party. Both of them.
The ‘change’ mantra, and the $2 billion spent creating it, has obviously been very effective:
“We are gonna spread happiness,
we are gonna spread freeeeedom,
Obama’s gonna change it,
Obama’s gonna leeeeead em,
we’re gonna change it,
and re-arrange it,
we are gonna change the world!” ( The Obama Kids’ Song )
- “We are gonna change the world!” Yes indeed, into world government.
January 30, 2009
As if the afore-cited ‘Obama Kids’ Song’ wasn’t indication enough, Steve Watson at Prisonplanet.com reported on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, the following chilling confirmation of the above analysis. The diabolical cultivation of a ‘Messianic’ figure under that ‘CHANGE’ mantra whose obligatory love and allegiance is being seeded into the very consciousness of the people, starting with young school children in public schools: ‘School Children Complain Of “Obama Worship” During Lessons’.
And as clairvoyantly already unraveled above, the empirical evidence of the reality of ‘CHANGE’ is immediately visible, both by a cursory glance at Obama’s cabinet, and by his response to world affairs from the very first day he took office as the President of the United States. Obama’s cabinet has already been examined by many.
What is far more empirically revealing with an immediacy that is remarkable, is the response to Israel’s genocidal shoah upon Gaza civilians. Obama had this ‘CHANGE’ to offer from the George W. Bush Administration after his prolonged silence because he wanted there to be “only one President at a time” so as not to cause any confusion with conflicting viewpoints on Israeli perpetuated and American endorsed and funded holocaust of the ‘untermenschen‘:
“Let me be clear: America is committed to Israel’s security. And we will always support Israel’s right to defend itself against legitimate threats. For years, Hamas has launched thousands of rockets at innocent Israeli citizens. No democracy can tolerate such danger to its people, nor should the international community, and neither should the Palestinian people themselves, whose interests are only set back by acts of terror.”
For ameliorating the Pakistan-Afghanistan ‘War on Terror’, President Barack Obama also authorized the following immediate ‘CHANGE’:
And most insidiously, for finalizing the finishing touches to the conversion of his own nation into a police-state as the key harbinger for ushering in all the core-controls necessary for world government, the following watershed ‘CHANGES’ silently transpired as the epitaph for Obama’s own beloved UNITED STATES OF AMERICA on his first day in the Oval Office:
And for those readers who, unlike Ms. Heather, might still think that all this is just reactionary happenstance in response to the rapidly emerging challenges of the multi-faceted crises facing the new American President, rather than a diabolically orchestrated premeditated plan for world-government, please see Project Humanbeingsfirst’s response to Financial Times Oped of December 08, 2008, where its “chief foreign affairs columnist” readily perceived these momentous criminal crises – wherein the average American is already losing both the skirt and shirt – as an opportunity for ushering in world government:
And also see the deconstruction of Henry Kissinger’s ominous statements of January 20, 2009, in Project Humanbeingsfirst’s January 2009 Financial Terrorism news analysis report where this globalist’s disingenuous advocacy of harnessing these (manufactured) crises as the great opportunity for a new world order may palpably be witnessed:
And if one is still skeptical with faith in the ‘Obama Messiah’, may the Shepherd be with you – as no ordinary humanbeingsfirst can bring the dead back to the living! But then again, perhaps a Christian pastor can (part1, part2).
The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.
Mr. Obama – The Post Modern Coup: Response to ‘You’re Scaring Me, Obama: Let the Bush Years Die’