Is Zionism a sophisticated Hegelian Dialectic?

Is Zionism a sophisticated Hegelian Dialectic?

Zahir Ebrahim, Project

September 06, 2009

Just like Brzezinski’s “The Grand Chessboard” [1] now appears to be a fantastic red herring to bankrupt the United States and create the right pretexts and ripe conditions to present a NAU to its public as the only panacea enroute to the international banksters‘ world government, is it possible that Zionism too was/is a phantasmic red herring to set the stage for Albert Pike’s World War III in order to drive the final nail into the coffin of all nationalism and sovereign nation-states?

The fact that the harbingers of all wars and world government are also the prime supporters of Zionism means little, for just as they were once prime supporters-bankrollers of the USSR and Nazi Socialism before destroying them, the Hegelian Dialectics of conquest require credible enemies, or rather credible opposites to achieve the synthesis of the desired agenda – global communism to be centrally controlled by a hierarchy at whose apex sit the all-seeing eye!

Is it at all possible that the modern Jews themselves were calculatingly setup with the mal construct of Zionism and entirely brainwashed/enticed into nurturing/supporting it with the introduction of Reform Judaism? Empirically, just as the Grand Chessboard initially appeared to be the blueprint for all the wars of conquest since 911 as the Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski deceptively pitched the believable “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization” mantra and showed how that could be subverted with a “new pearl harbor” in order to perpetuate “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives”, Zionism too appears as the believable blueprint for Eretz Yisrael that Jews must pursue as their ‘divine imperative’. But is that the real planned endgame? Is that what Theodor Herzl, a secular atheistic ideologue, really after as he spun his ‘Der Judenstadt’ for the hidden hand of the international banksters who almost entirely bankrolled Zionism through their many vassals throughout the 19th and 20th century?

Notice that in any critique of Zionism or Israel, [2] the names of International bankers is seldom uttered. And yet, the Balfour Declaration was issued to Lionel Rothschild, and Moses Hess, the reformer of Messianic Judaism who ushered in the notion that Jews don’t have to wait for a Messiah in order to return to their Promised Land, was presumably bankrolled by the Rothschilds.

Today, these banksters and their offspring control all the world’s private central banks as well as most of the world’s debt, and through the infinite monies they rake in through usury, control all the foundations, think tanks, global governing-lending-financial institutions, including the United States Congress and its military-industrial complex, and through them all the political bases, and through them all the world events including its media coverage. Thus, not only is our condition of voluntary servitude, but also our perception of our own zeitgeist, entirely and completely in these oligarchs’ Orwellian hands!

Is Zionism merely a tool in their hands too, just like the venerated Mujahideens once were for taking down the USSR, and the despised ‘militant Islam’ now is to perpetuate the manufactured ‘war on terror’? The real unhidden agenda of free-market capitalism to be so egregiously maligned for its unbridled greed and unbridled conquest, and subsequently, as a solution to that problem, replaced by a centrally managed world communism with these banksters consolidating all the world’s assets, properties, land, natural wealth, and legal-political-financial-economic-military power into their own private grubby little hands? And their Hegelian Dialectical brainchild of Zionism merely being essential to fighting another World War that will destroy it as well as all the remaining vestiges of the “old world order”? Is the famous neocon quip “Zion that will light up all the world” the banksters’ ephemeral ploy of the Straussian vintage to malign Godly Judaism just as much as they malign the other Godly religions of antiquity?

For Secular Humanism is indeed the modern religion of conquest, and Nietzsche their god. [3] That god killed off absolutes and ushered in relativity of morality whereby ends justify the means. Humanity in this new religion is merely sheep to by guided by the illuminated ones, utilized for their benefit, and when necessary, population controlled as in any natural wildlife preserve. The human rights in this modernity are relative to an agenda, and as Justice Vinson of the U.S. Supreme Court had candidly opined in 1951:

Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” [4]

If all this grotesque perversion is indeed true as empiricism suggests it to be, and not merely a tin-hatted conspiracy theory, [5] then, instead of focussing on Zionism which will be destroyed in time by the oligarchs anyway along with most of humanity, [6] is it perhaps high time the spotlights from all directions get focussed on the real roothead of oppression?

The ones who nurture not only this mal construct abhorrence among a beleaguered humanity in Palestine, [7] but are also the prime-movers behind all the abhorrent wars orchestrated by their glorified ‘errand boys’? [8]

The ones who use their dialectical instruments for one-world government to piece-meal enslave us all using multifaceted fabricated pretexts [9] in the best mold of Hegelian Dialectics?

Who can deny with a straight face that their diabolical “end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [has not already] accomplish[ed] much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” [10] ever could have!

But wait – let’s just keep talking of one-state vs. two-state solution as Jimmy Carter just did in his Washington Post article today. [11]







[6] See analysis of NSSM 200 in




[10] Richard N. Gardner, “The Hard Road To World Order”, April 1974, Foreign Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations.


— end


Is Zionism a sophisticated Hegelian Dialectic?