Letter to Christopher Jon Bjerknes on Egypt Revolution, Israel Shamir, Pan Islamism By Zahir Ebrahim

Letter to Christopher Jon Bjerknes on Egypt Revolution, Israel Shamir, Pan Islamism

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

February 15, 2011

To: Christopher Jon Bjerknes jewishracism

Subject: Your take on Egypt, Shamir, Pan Islamism

Date: Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:57 PM

Dear Jon,


I have spent a few hours on your website [ http://jewishracism.blogspot.com ] today after a long time. I agree with your take on the items listed in the title, except the sole focus upon the “Jews”. I think you would agree that Eastern Jews lived among the Muslims for centuries without problems. I am a Muslim. It is the Western Jews uneasy and often ugly two millennia long co-existence with the Christians in the West, which we principally see surfacing today in the race to dominate and conquer the Earth, rather than the mutually amicable co-existence of the Jews in the East among the Muslims.

Here is my response to John Kaminski [the rabid Jew hater] which I think might interest you – this is how Muslims from the East generally tend to perceive the world of hectoring hegemons, the world of the white man seeking to colonize the ‘untermenschen’:


Therefore, I wonder if there is a way to qualify your usage of the term “Jews” – the Khazar, primary source of Western Jewry, is different from the Semitic peoples of the East, and you know this better than most Westerners. And conquest knows no religion, as one can evidently glean by even a cursory glance at the history of Christendom itself. So, I like to use [their own self-ascribed] term “Hectoring Hegemons”. That set today principally comprises the Ashkenazi banksters at the top of the ideological and power hierarchy, with uncle toms and mercenaries, fools and patsies at the lower layers. The bottom most layer is the foolish goyem who have been administered so much “hegelian mind-fck” that they are willing to accept anything given to them as solution. This is principally your opinion as well – from what I have gathered reading your works. Right?

All which you have described about subversions and revolutions, is the Ashkenazi Western Jews seeding and harvesting “revolutionary times”, seeding chaos, in order to achieve their world government agenda – which is as old as hegemony, as old as mankind [paraphrasing Zbigniew Brzezinski’s opening sentence in The Grand Chessboard].

Therefore, I would like to ask you if it is fair to continue to use the blanket term “Jews” to refer to them in this way without qualification? There are Jews in India, Iraq, Iran and elsewhere, even here in the United States, the NK, who do not accept the Zionist agendas. The crypto-Jews, the revolutionaries in disguise, were, and still are, almost always Western in origin. You have argued the same of the Dönmeh (sp?) and shown that to be the case for the Young Turks as well.

So can you come up with another terminology to refer to the latter day ‘ubermensch’ who’d once again dare to destroy the ‘untermensch’ du jour, playing their bogus revolution and war games pitting brother against brother?

And thank you for your acute opinion on Egypt – it is similar to mine, modulo the above clarification caveat:



And by extension, I also agree with your take on their [the hectoring hegemons’ hegelian mind-fck] riling for “revolution” in the United States!

Furthermore, let me also say that your logic in your article ‘On the Myth that Greater Numbers Necessarily Equate to Greater Strength’ is profoundly unarguable (again modulo the clarification caveat on the term “Jews” above):


You are probably right on their [hectoring hegemons’] Pan-Islamic agenda too [regionalism as baby-step towards full consolidation into a one-world government].

But what can our nations pragmatically do when we are entirely stage-managed by uncle toms and other mercenaries? And [when] our “rebellions” are also entirely stage managed as well?

Wasn’t it Winston Churchill who had stated in the waning days of direct colonialism, something to the effect: it is cheaper to rule Egypt not with [a foreign] army but by controlling the ruler of Egypt who in turn will control the Egyptians? Well, he wasn’t being original. See Lord Macaulay’s speech of 1835 where he created that concept to rule the British colonies. Churchill merely removed the overt control, leaving in place the colonized mind-set created by Macaulay. Here is a link to Macaulay’s brilliant speech on how to conquer a people:


When you call upon the Egyptians for instance to be Egyptians first, a) whom are you addressing? And b) what right do you have to separate them from the Islamic heritage and advocate their pre-Islamic heritage?

Don’t you think that the Egyptian thinkers know what is good for their own peoples – but they are just as forcibly ruled by hectoring hegemons as your own nation? When you can’t do anything here, when you complain no one is listening to you here, why do you think matters are any different in Egypt that they need to be told what they ought to strive for? No self-respecting Egyptian, or any people, will want to learn solutions from outsiders. Just thought I’d share that with you, because, as a Pakistani, I don’t need anyone to tell me what I ought to want. My inability to deal with the powers ruling my country has little to do with not knowing the solution. The problem is not what solution, the problem is how [to get rid of the entrenched powers lording upon us in proxy services to the hectoring hegemons]. Same as yours.

[And,] while I am writing you, I might as well leave a comment for your article on Israel Shamir:


It is my article which shows him to be yet another one of those for whom the world might have been better off without his “metanoia”:


Finally, before I forget it, I was searching for information on John Kaminski, whether or not he is a Jew [the lady doth protest too much, methinks,] and came across your article:


Your write: “I note in this context that Smith/Setters told me that John Kaminski is a Jew”.

I would like to know if you are aware, whether John Kaminski has himself ever admitted to it.

Best wishes,

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-jon-bjerknes-egypt-revolution.html

Mirror URL: https://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/letter-jon-bjerknes-egypt-revolution-israelshamir-pan-islamism-by-zahirebrahim/

Source PDF: http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/letter-jon-bjerknes-egypt-revolution-israelshamir-pan-islamism-by-zahir-ebrahim.pdf

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.

02/16/2011 09:00:06 1270

Letter to Christopher Jon Bjerknes on Egypt Revolution, Israel Shamir, Pan Islamism By Zahir Ebrahim